By Mohamed Elmenshawy
Just
a few months ago, no one would have imagined that at the beginning of April a
delegation of Egyptian Muslim Brothers would visit Washington -- let alone be
warmly welcomed inside the White House and the State Department. Even more
surprising, it now appears that the Egyptian Salafis -- the Muslim
Brotherhood's more conservative Islamist counterparts in Parliament -- have
grown jealous of the Brotherhood's warm reception in America's capital. A
credible source close to the Salafis confirmed that they, too, now desire a
visit to Washington.
The
main Salafi political party, al-Nour, captured approximately 24 percent of the
Parliament's seats in last winter's election. An inaugural Salafi visit to the
U.S. is likely to occur as part of a larger delegation of Egyptian
parliamentarians that includes representatives of all political parties. A trip
under these circumstances would be acceptable to both the Salafis and the Obama
administration, and could be justified as a step towards bridging the
substantial cultural and political gap between the two sides.
The
Nour party's endorsement on Saturday of moderate Islamist candidate Abdel Moneim
Aboul Fotouh for president sends a clear message about the party's pragmatic
and flexible approach, since Abdel-Fotouh is supported by both moderates and
liberals.
Nevertheless,
the Salafis will face a dilemma when they visit Washington. For many in America
and Europe, the Brotherhood has come to represent the face of moderate
political Islam in Egypt. By contrast, it remains to be seen how the Salafis
will present themselves to the Western world. Will they portray their movement
as a replacement for violent political groups, as an alternative to al-Qaeda,
or as the embodiment of conservative and fundamental Islam?
The
Salafis will no doubt remind their Washington interlocutors that they, too,
listened to President Obama at Cairo University in June 2009, where he pledged
to respect the desires and choices of Egyptians, saying: "The United
States will welcome all governments elected democratically and in a peaceful
manner."
While
the Salafis represent the most conservative of the religious right in Egyptian
politics, they also represent about a quarter of the Egyptian population, and
therefore cannot be ignored or marginalized. The United States recognizes and
works with many conservative governments around the world, some of which are
among Washington's most important allies. The U.S. also has its own right-wing
religious movement, personified in the candidacy of Rick Santorum, which has
exerted considerable political power in the past few years and is expected to
influence the upcoming 2012 elections.
To
be sure, some of the Salafis' current leadership previously rejected the
validity of the democratic process. For example, Sheikh Yasser Burhami once
explained: "We want democracy, but one constrained by God's laws. Ruling
without God's laws is infidelity." Prominent Sheikhs who cautioned their
followers against political participation in the past are now calling upon
their followers to use democracy as a mechanism through which to implement
Sharia' law.
If
and when the Salafis come to Washington, they will be on the hook to explain
their conservative positions on hot-button political issues like women's and
minority rights. Members of Congress will grill them on the repeated
proclamations by Salafi sheikhs that women be confined to the home and denied
the right to work. They will want to know whether the Salafis will seek to
impose Islamic dress standards on all Egyptian women. The Salafis will be
hard-pressed to come up with a satisfactory response to questions regarding the
treatment of Egypt's Coptic Christian minority, whom they believe should be
barred from the presidency and from holding elected political office. Their
leadership's refusal to endorse political pluralism will be the Salafis'
greatest liability in Washington. Several months after its election to
parliament, the al-Nour party still lacks a clear and coherent response to
questions about how it will deal with the political and human rights and
responsibilities of citizens, the role of religion in public life, and the
definition of Egyptian citizenship. The Salafis can also expect congressmen to
seek clarification on their exact position regarding the peace treaty with
Israel.
Moreover,
their persistent demand that the U.S. release Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman won't
win the Salafis friends in Washington, either. The Sheikh is currently serving
a life sentence in a Colorado prison for his role in the 1993 World Trade
Center Attacks, an act of terrorism that killed several American civilians. His
release is completely untenable to the U.S., and the Salafis should drop any
expectation that such a demand would be considered.
The
Salafis may find a more receptive audience in Washington if their traveling
group is led by representatives of the al-Nour Party, the most realistic and
relatively moderate of the Salafi parties, especially when it comes to issues
such as women's and minority rights and Sharia' law
This
scenario would be their best chance at laying the foundation for a working
relationship with the U.S. Establishing a direct dialogue serves the interests
of the Salafis as well as the Americans, and holds the potential to raise
Washington's stature in the Middle East. If it does manage to create ties with the
Salafis, the U.S. can then rightfully claim that it works with all elements of
the Egyptian polity, including those with which it does not share a common
political belief. This would be a welcome development for U.S.-Egyptian
relations and for America's standing in the region.
- This Opnion first appeared in the Huffington Post on May 11, 2012
- Mohamed Elmenshawy is Director of Languages and Regional Studies in the Middle East Institute
- Mohamed Elmenshawy is Director of Languages and Regional Studies in the Middle East Institute
No comments:
Post a Comment