Meet Murad Muwafi, the most important man in Egypt you’ve never
heard of.
BY MAGDY SAMAAN
When
Hosni Mubarak fell from power in February 2011, many elements of his regime
remained in place -- at least at first. In the year since then, the Egyptian
army, the police, and the business elite have struggled to cope with the tide
of revolutionary change washing over the Arab world’s most populous country.
Not
one of these institutions has made it through the process entirely intact. The
deeply unpopular national police force has seen its authority relentlessly
eroded by protestors and the press. Mubarak-era crony capitalists have landed
in jail, their old deals under fire from rivals or the courts. And the
military, which has ruled the country in the guise of the Supreme Council of
the Armed Forces (SCAF), has become the focus of popular anger as it struggles
to maintain its control. Now the Muslim Brotherhood, which has ridden recent
electoral victories to a dominant position in the new parliament, is set to
advance its own agenda, thus adding a fresh element of unpredictability to the
struggle for power.
Yet
one pillar of the old regime has survived the turmoil with its authority intact
-- if not expanded. It is the General Intelligence Directorate (GID), the
country’s most powerful intelligence agency. As the elderly generals of the
SCAF have only fanned the flames of discontent with their clumsy maneuverings
in recent months, the GID, which reigns supreme among Egypt’s competing
security services, has gradually emerged as something like the brain trust of
the leadership. Unlike the ruling generals, its officers act outside of the
limelight, their workings largely obscure to the media and the public. Its role
has enabled the GID (commonly known in Arabic as the Mukhabarat) to capitalize
on the uncertainty that plagues other reigning institutions. As a result, the
man who runs it -- an inscrutable 61-year-old by the name of Murad Muwafi -- is
now poised to assume a key role in the next phase of high-level intrigue.
It
is understandable that historians of revolution tend to focus on the
revolutionaries, the drivers of change. Yet every political upheaval also
spawns its share of Muwafi-like figures, the backroom operators who use their
command of bureaucratic intrigue to make the leap from the old regime to the
new. To be sure, the Egyptian spymaster is no Talleyrand. In contrast with that
shrewd defender of monarchy who went on to side with the French Revolution and
ultimately served as Napoleon’s foreign minister, Muwafi is no silky
intellectual. His rare appearances on Egyptian TV, for example, have tended to
highlight his less-than-perfect command of Arabic -- befitting a long-time
military officer who has risen through the ranks by virtue of a prodigious
memory and a shrewd understanding of the realities of power. Yet there is no
question that his long years as political trouble-shooter have uniquely
equipped him to maneuver through Egypt’s turbulent transition.
When,
for example, the leaders of the military decided it was time to talk with human
rights activists last fall, it was Muwafi who represented the SCAF at the
meeting. One factor may have been his ample experience as Egypt’s chief
mediator between Israel and the Palestinians. And when the SCAF dispatched
emissaries to Washington last year, Muwafi figured in that delegation, too. (He
even had his own private audience with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.)
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta made a point of including Muwafi among his
interlocutors when he visited Egypt in the fall -- right after a session of
cheesecake and bowling with SCAF supremo Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi. And
perhaps most revealingly of all, it was Muwafi -- rather than Tantawi or the
Egyptian foreign minister – to whom Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
turned when a mob stormed the Israeli Embassy in Cairo in September.
Yet
no one should make the mistake of assuming that the GID’s work is restricted to
lofty strategic issues. Muwafi’s agency is uniquely equipped to navigate the
everyday details of domestic politics by virtue of its position as the
country’s top domestic security agency. To this day, no one can get a job in
Egypt’s vast public bureaucracy without being vetted by the secret police --
and the GID has full access to the files, along with its lower-ranking sister
agency, the State Security Service (rebranded in March last year as the
“National Security Force"). Decades of tracking, interrogating, and
blackmailing dissidents give the GID vast leverage over Egypt’s new generation
of politicians.
Given
its past involvement in matters that hardly fit the traditional Western
definition of national security (such as management of the government crisis
response during Nile flooding), the spy agency almost certainly has extensive
knowledge of Egypt’s economic affairs as well. “Events since the fall of
Mubarak demonstrate that SCAF’s plans to control Egyptian society were actually
dominated by State Security and the GID, which served as the eyes and the
memory of the regime,” wrote political analyst Amin Al-Mahdi in a column last
year. Former army officer Ahmed Ezzat, who started a Facebook page that tracked
allegations of corruption among Egypt’s military establishment, claims that the
GID has used its budget funds to start private companies whose profits benefit
high-ranking officers of the intelligence service. What’s more, says Ezzat, GID
companies have no-bid access to government contracts. “The GID is a state
within the state,” he writes. “There is no professional, financial, or legal
oversight of its operations.”
Muwafi’s
background remains something of a mystery. But what is clear is that he would
not be where he is without Omar Suleiman, his predecessor as Egypt’s chief
spymaster. During his 18-year reign as head of the GID starting in 1993,
Suleiman, one of Mubarak’s key confidants, vastly extended the agency’s reach,
broadening its more traditional intelligence portfolio to include sensitive
national security issues ranging from relations with Iran and Israel to
monitoring the Islamist opposition. At the same time, however, the GID
continued to involve itself in the minutia of everyday Egyptian life. GID
operatives have been known to intervene in a sectarian conflict involving a
Coptic Christian priest, or to arbitrate a labor dispute between managers of a
textile factory and their dismissed employees. Cairo human rights lawyer Ahmed
Seif El-Islam Hamad recounts a case when sociologists at a provincial
university decided to conduct a survey on young people’s attitudes towards sex.
Unsettled by the potentially sensitive nature of the study, a dean at the
university called in a local GID officer for advice.
Muwafi’s
talents made him a perfect fit for the peculiarly Egyptian national security
establishment. Beginning his career as an army officer, he gradually rose to
the head of Egyptian military intelligence. (A rare Arabic-language article on
his career is shown here in a rough version provided by Google Translate.) That
background served him well when he took on a job as governor of the
strategically sensitive Northern Sinai District in 2010. Though he was able to
take some credit for improving security in the border zone, he later came under
fire for describing the area’s itinerant Bedouin tribes as “criminals” who
earned profits from their smuggling business with Gaza.
In
January 2011, Mubarak promoted Suleiman to the vice presidency in a desperate
bid to bolster the foundering regime. But Suleiman, like his boss, failed to
live up to the task, and he resigned soon after the dictator’s ouster.
Meanwhile, State Security found itself facing the indignities of popular
discontent. In early March, a mob attacked its offices in Cairo, seizing files
documenting persecution of the government’s opponents. But unlike the seemingly
comparable storming of Stasi headquarters in East Berlin in January 1990, this
event didn’t mark the end of Egypt’s internal security services. If anything,
it ended up shifting even more power to the elite GID, which, as part of the
military establishment, maintains its most sensitive facilities on inaccessible
army bases, out of the reach of the turmoil on the streets.
Muwafi,
in any event, has only continued to thrive in the post-Mubarak era. Last spring
he was one of the first Egyptian officials contacted by the U.S. after it
emerged that the SCAF had freed the brother of al Qaeda leader Ayman
al-Zawahiri from jail as part of an amnesty for political prisoners. The
brother, Muhamad al-Zawahiri, was re-arrested just a few days later. Around the
same time Muwafi was mediating in "unity talks" between Hamas and
Fatah, as well as participating in discussions with Hamas about a possible move
of its headquarters from Damascus to Cairo. (So far, at least, the move has not
materialized.) When Muwafi made an unprecedented trip to Syria last year in
connection with those talks, the event was a source of considerable disquiet to
both the Americans and the Israelis, who wondered whether Egypt was in the
process of reorienting its policies away from the relatively pro-Israel line of
the Mubarak era. Muwafi was also credited with helping to broker the prisoner
exchange that freed Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit from Hamas captivity.
But
Muwafi -- though rarely figuring in Egyptian media coverage -- has continued to
expand his domestic portfolio as well. As SCAF bosses continued to make misstep
after misstep, it was Muwafi who engaged the regime’s opponents in two separate
meetings in October 2011. Hamad, the human rights lawyer, who participated in
one of the sessions, recalls Muwafi saying that he would report on the talks
directly to Tantawi. The encounter was revealing for the insights it afforded
into the Machiavellian mindset of the governing military elite. When some of
the activists present suggested firing Prime Minister Esam Sharaf, at the time
trying to negotiate a delicate course between the SCAF and the demands of
protestors in the streets, Muwafi, according to Hamad, responded, “If we let
him go now he will become a national hero.” And when the oppositionists
demanded the government lift the state of emergency effective in the country
since 1971, Muwafi declined on the grounds that “it will look like we succumbed
to American pressure.”
There
is scant indication that the GID or Egypt’s military rulers have changed their
thinking in any substantial ways. Even today, many months after Mubarak’s
downfall, activists tell of development projects that have been scotched by the
intelligence service’s refusal to grant a “security approval.” It is widely
rumored that the recent raids on 17 Egyptian and foreign NGOs, ostensibly
triggered by funding irregularities, were based on reports supplied by the
intelligence agency. “The SCAF places more trust in the intelligence service
because it’s part of the military,” says Bahi El Din Hassan, head of the Cairo
Institute for Human Rights Studies. “Reports from the Interior Ministry” -- which controls the police -- “don’t enjoy
the same sort of credibility.”
The
dialogue Muwafi started with the activists did not continue. “It seems that the
mission was linked with its timing,” says Hassan. “That was a period when the
SCAF was making lots of mistakes in its management of the transition period and
criticism of its actions was rising.” It may be that the Muslim Brotherhood’s
success at the polls has convinced the generals that they no longer need to
take the secular opposition into account; many observers of the Egyptian
political scene suspect that the SCAF and the Brotherhood may have already
negotiated a covert power-sharing deal. But no matter what happens next, expect
to see Murad Muwafi playing a pivotal role.
-This article was published in Foreign Policy on 03/02/2012
-Egyptian journalist Magdy Samaan works for the Daily Telegraph bureau in Cairo. He was a visiting fellow at the Atlantic Council's Rafik Hariri Institute for the Middle East and was a 2011 MENA Democracy Fellow at the World Affairs Institute
-Egyptian journalist Magdy Samaan works for the Daily Telegraph bureau in Cairo. He was a visiting fellow at the Atlantic Council's Rafik Hariri Institute for the Middle East and was a 2011 MENA Democracy Fellow at the World Affairs Institute
No comments:
Post a Comment