Its strategic retreat is most visible at regional level. Tehran is
in a perpetual conflict with its neighbours
By Abdulkhaleq Abdullah
After
nearly a decade of regional expansion, Iran is in for a strategic retreat. This
time last year Tehran was counting its numerous regional and international
gains. But from now on it seems that Iran will have to take stock of its
regional and global losses, which are piling up by the day.
The
setbacks start at home. Politically, Iran, which is gearing up for crucial
parliamentary elections due on March 2, is badly polarised. The political
division in Iran is at an all-time high and is eating into its domestic legitimacy
and stability. The stimulus for this political polarisation is the simmering
power struggle in the confusing, multi-layered Iranian decision-making strata.
The battle between the regime's hardline clerics headed by the Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the dogmatic clique around the handicapped President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is serious and paralysing.
Iran
is also looking very feeble economically. The financial strain is so dire that
the rial has already lost more than 40 per cent of its value. As the economy
flounders, business is being held back and investments are drying up. The
European Union implemented last week a total ban on the import of Iranian crude
oil and blocked trade in precious metals, among other steps. These measures, in
addition to the unilateral sanctions already imposed by the US and the UN, are
taking a big toll on Iran's lifeblood — its oil revenue.
The
usually bombastic Ahmadinejad has admitted that the current sanctions are
"the heaviest economic onslaught on Iran in history ... every day, all our
banking and trade activities and our agreements are being monitored and
blocked". The economic sanctions and boycotts are crippling and Iran can
do nothing about them except make counterproductive threats.
Such
irrational reactions have increased the country's international isolation,
which reached new heights at the start of 2012, when Brazil's new President
Dilma Rousseff refused to meet with Ahmadinejad during his visit to Latin
America earlier this month. This comes on top of China's growing frustration
with Tehran's latest threats to close the vital Strait of Hormuz. Losing close
allies and old friends while making new enemies is becoming Iran's new
favourite game.
The
announcement by the US Department of Justice on October 11, 2011, that two men
had been charged in connection with an alleged Iranian Quds force plot to
assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States, Adel Al Jubeir,
consolidated Iran's exclusion and its reputation as an ostracised nation.
Irreparable damage
Yet
Iran's strategic retreat is most visible at the regional level. Tehran is mired
in a perpetual conflict with its immediate neighbours, the six Arab Gulf
states. They have an inflated view of Iran as a deeply destabilising force in
the neighbourhood. On the top of their endless concerns is Tehran's presumed
meddling in their internal affairs, i.e. Bahrain, and its "invisible
hand" in agitating the sectarian divide in the Arab Gulf and throughout
the region. Iraq is also suddenly feeling the same and is equally getting
irritated by Iran's flagrant interference in its domestic politics.
Most
immediately, Tehran stands utterly hopeless as its strategic ally in the Arab
world, the brutal Bashar Al Assad regime in Syria, enters an imminent danger
zone. A politically weak Syria translates into a politically weak Iran and if
the Al Assad regime collapses the whole resistance axis, which Iran invested in
so heavily for the past two decades, will disappear too.
Revolutionary
Iran is seen to stand on the wrong side of history. Many in the Arab world are
now saying out loud ‘shame on you Iran' for standing by a regime that has
killed on average 20 of its people on a daily basis for the past 10 months. To
those and other old admirers, Iran is now viewed as a counter-revolutionary
force. This is causing an irreparable damage to its revolutionary credentials,
which had been until now the biggest source of its soft power in the Arab
world.
Few
if any are thinking of Iran as role model. No one is inspired by its Islamic republic
viewed as a theocratic regime run by a clerical hierarchy. In fact many
Islamists are adamant about not wanting to associate themselves with the 1979
revolution.
Clearly
all these setbacks amount to what Mustafa Alani has aptly described by saying ‘the
party is over for Iran'. Surely these are not the best of times for Iran. The
Iran of 2012 is a shrinking Iran that has already seen its golden days and is
running out of steam and luck. If 2011 was a tough year for Iran, 2012 is bound
to be even tougher for the typically defiant nation. Iran is a destabilising
force and it is time for it to be downsized.
The
process of downsizing Iran is in the best interests of regional and global
peace and stability. Sanctions, covert actions and further international
isolation are the way to do it. This is the duty of the entire world community
and 2012 is the year to do it.
-This commentary was
published in The Gulf News on 31/01/2012
-Dr Abdulkhaleq Abdullah is a Professor of Political Science. You can follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/Abdulkhaleq_uae
-Dr Abdulkhaleq Abdullah is a Professor of Political Science. You can follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/Abdulkhaleq_uae
No comments:
Post a Comment