This blog is intended to provide the reader with important world news with an emphasis on Middle East and North Africa. It will publish news, analyses, comments, and opinions concerning those two regions. However, We welcome any comments, news or opinions which are related to their countries. You can visit too www.asswak-alarab.com for more information.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
The Dumb Idea Hall Of Fame
There's much more where this came from, but here are five terrible
ideas to get us started.
BY AARON DAVID MILLER
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
my 25 years of government service, I came up with more than my fair share of
bad or just plain dumb ideas (see Arafat, Yasir, invitation to the Holocaust
museum). In fact, I consider myself something of an expert on the subject.
life's about learning, right? And like Justice Potter Stewart's famous 1964
opinion on pornography, these days I've come to know a bad idea when I see one.
Middle East provides a particularly fertile ground for both the birth and
demise of dumb ideas. And they come in varying shapes and sizes. Here are five
candidates for some of the most inconsequential, ill-advised, or potentially
dangerous dumb ideas proposed during the past year or so.
grandfathering them in as potential nominees for the Dumb Idea Hall of Fame, a
new feature to which I intend to devote at least one column a month.
Dumb Idea No. 1: Palestinian statehood at the U.N.
most woolly-headed and inconsequential idea goes to the Palestinians for
pretending (they actually may not really believe it themselves) that action at
the United Nations might help their cause for statehood. Having tried this idea
once last September with predictable results -- a big, fat nothingburger -- the
PLO may be gearing up again for another run.
can only wonder why. The Palestinians are desperate, to be sure, and the U.N.
statehood gambit (like faux unity talks with Hamas) plays well on the street.
But their lack of strategy and penchant for bad timing are breathtaking. So
far, the U.N. initiative has produced implacable American opposition, U.S.
congressional constraints on funding for the Palestinians, and America's
withdrawal from UNESCO.
last thing a U.S. president is going to do in an election year is support such
an initiative. And it gives the Israeli government, already uninterested in
real negotiations, just another reason to blame the impasse on the
Palestinians. But hey, the Palestinians are going to do what they're going to
do whether it makes sense or not. The best thing that can be said about the
U.N. gambit is that it really doesn't matter.
Dumb Idea No. 2: Safe zones in Syria
ideas are one thing; potentially dangerous ideas are quite another. And that
distinction goes to the idea of creating safe zones in Syria in an effort to
pressure, if not topple, the regime of Bashar al-Assad. The proponents of this
idea are either interminably obtuse or quite calculating and see the creation
of such zones as a way to sucker the United States or other external powers
into military action against the Assads. Either way, this approach has every
sign of being half-baked, ill-advised, and open-ended. Indeed, it's driven by
the most dangerous idea of all: that America needs to act and do something,
regardless of the consequences.
zones or humanitarian corridors have at least three purposes. The most obvious
is to offer sanctuary to Syrians fleeing the fighting and the regime. The Turks
would have the most incentive here, if cross-border refugee flows get out of
other objectives -- providing a safe haven to train and organize rebels who
oppose the regime, and hoping to further cause splits in the regime by
occupying Syrian territory -- are far more dubious. These areas would have to
be defended, which would mean more boots on the ground over time (remember: it
took eight months to bring down Muammar al-Qaddafi's rinky-dink army). Syrian
air defenses would need to be suppressed to avoid regime attacks. And poof --
before you know it, we have an open-ended escalation. This kind of piecemeal
intervention is the worst outcome of all -- getting involved militarily without
getting results. Andrew Exum of the Center for a New American Security has it
right on this one: When it comes to military options, either the United States
intervenes decisively -- as a matter of vital national interest -- or it stays
out. Half-measures and incremental efforts to increase the pressure will likely
result in additional costs without real results.
Dumb Idea No. 3: Bombing Iran Now
can or should blame a tiny country living on the knife's edge with a dark past
-- even one with an estimated 200-plus nuclear weapons -- for worrying deeply
about a mullah-controlled Iran with the bomb.
Israel does about the prospects of a nuclear Iran and when is a more complex
matter. Striking Iran anytime soon -- even if the nuclear talks don't produce a
deal quickly -- would be dumb. It's a different thing to assume grave risks if
success is likely and you have broad support even if you fail.
attack now will not prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear capacity. It would be
tantamount to mowing the grass; Iran would accelerate its nuclear program, most
likely with greater international support. The world would be furious with the
Israelis (see: higher oil prices, financial markets tanking, regional
tensions), and nobody -- not even the United States -- would really understand
why Israel struck when Iran didn't have enough fissile material to make a bomb
and hadn't mastered the assembly of components, let alone tested a nuclear
weapon. The Israelis' claim that they needed to strike because Iran's nuclear
sites were now immune from attack would not be judged compelling by anyone.
much smarter -- though hardly easy -- for the Israelis to allow more time for
sanctions to take their toll, see whether some deal on enrichment is possible,
and if not, press the Americans to do what the president in March publicly
articulated he would: not just contain Iran but prevent it from acquiring a
the Israelis, they've likely built extra time into their assessment regarding
when and how Iran's nuclear sites will be immune from attack. If sanctions and
diplomacy can't stop Iran from acquiring a weapon, a military option can't and
shouldn't be ruled out. The dumb idea is exercising it now.
Dumb Idea No. 4: Obama's push for a settlement freeze
has any U.S. president committed more of a stumble during his first year than
when Barack Obama decided to make Israeli settlements the focus of his approach
to Arab-Israeli peacemaking.
one fell swoop, the president set himself up for failure, turned his
relationship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into a macho contest of who
had bigger cojones (Obama lost), and alienated the Palestinians and the Arabs
because he backed down. And for all this, the United States succeeded in
getting no real freeze, no deal, and no negotiations. The president's tough
rhetoric on settlements only made the problem worse as the gap between words
and deeds swallowed his credibility whole.
with the Israelis is an occupational reality for any president or secretary of
state who wants to do serious peacemaking. The fight, however, needs to be at
the right time and on the right issue. If done correctly (i.e., with a
strategy), it can actually be productive and benefit not only the United
States, but the Israelis and Palestinians too.
fight worth having, with both sides, is over the actual substance of an
agreement. But given the gaps that separate the two sides and Obama's own
indecision about what he wants, that fight isn't worth having. Yet.
Dumb Idea No. 5: A bad idea is better than no idea
ideas come along for many reasons. Sometimes they result from bad analysis,
imperfect policy options, or desperation. They can also arise from wishful
thinking or from an obsession with fixing things.
a variation of that last notion that represents the dumbest idea of all: that
action -- any action, no matter how harebrained and ill-advised -- is better
than no action. This idea is quintessentially American and results from the
unique blend of idealism and pragmatism that cuts to the core of who Americans
are as a people and how they see the world.
fact is, Americans can't help themselves. America isn't a potted plant.
Americans believe they can always make a bad situation better. This fix-it
mentality is in our DNA. If it's harnessed and rigorously controlled, the
United States can actually accomplish some things, particularly if it actually
thinks through a strategy. But if not, it leads to what my friend Gamal Helal,
an Arabic-language interpreter and confidant of presidents and secretaries of
state, calls the United States' rush toward disaster. America is headed that
way on Syria, I'm afraid.
fondest hope would be to avoid dumb ideas altogether. This may not be possible.
The need to act is just too strong. Perhaps we can at least limit the damage.
But based on a couple of decades or so of government experience, I'm not
holding my breath.
-This commentary was published in Foreign Policy on 02/05/2012
-Aaron David Miller is a distinguished scholar at the Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars. His new book, Can America Have Another Great
President?, will be published this year