This blog is intended to provide the reader with important world news with an emphasis on Middle East and North Africa. It will publish news, analyses, comments, and opinions concerning those two regions. However, We welcome any comments, news or opinions which are related to their countries. You can visit too www.asswak-alarab.com for more information.
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Will Ahmadinejad Be Iran’s Sadat?
By Ali Ibrahim
Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
general impression of the 6th and current president of the Islamic Republic of
Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is that he is hardline in his ideology, populist in
his politics, and that he issues fiery but often illogical foreign policy
statements. Indeed Ahmadinejad sometimes speaks of “messages” and “dreams”
during his foreign policy statements, which is certainly something that has no
place in either the world of politics or reality.
from time to time another personality appears which is completely different
than the image or impression that Ahmadinejad is keen to portray. This is
something that causes one to question whether our impression of Ahmadinejad is
correct or not, and whether we know everything about what truly goes on behind
the scenes in Iranian politics and decision-making, particularly as this is a
closed country where foreign journalists cannot work freely.
statements to the Washington Post, in which he announced the “unilateral
pardon” and release of two jailed American hikers who claim to have accidently
crossed into Iran – after a third hiker was released on bail [in 2010] – is an
example of the Iranian president’s pragmatism. The issuance of this statement
was timed to coincide with his trip to New York to attend the UN General
Assembly. However this decision to pardon the American hikers was not received
favorably by Ahmadinejad’s conservative rivals who are stalling on its
implementations under a number of pretexts, the latest being that the judge
that must sign their release documents has not returned from holiday. In his
interview with the Washington Post, Ahmadinejad did not deny the presence of a
conflict between himself and the Iranian Supreme Leader Grand Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei, answering a question to this effect with another question, namely
“can you find two people who see the world the same?” Ahmadinejad therefore did
not deny that this conflict, more importantly he placed himself on the same
level as Khamenei.
months prior to this, specifically during the first week of July, Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – a graduate of the Revolutionary Guards who has
a PhD in transportation engineer and planning and who is known as a hardliner –
surprised us by coming out to announce his strong opposition to the decision
made by Iranian Higher Education Minister [Kamran Daneshjoo] to implement
gender segregation at Iran’s universities. Ahmadinejad ordered him to overturn
this decision, as part of his battle with the conservative camp in Iran which
has undergone a number of different stages since the beginning of the year.
battle with the conservatives, along with that of his team, particularly his
top aide and son-in-law Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, has entered a more serious
stage this year, and this is something that has confused the [political]
classification of this Iranian president, who was originally from the
conservative camp. The conservative camp strongly supported Ahmadinejad during
the first presidential elections in 2005; however this battle reached the point
where he was being accused of not recognizing Khamenei’s [religious] authority,
whilst some of his aides were most recently accused of being devil worshippers.
clear unifying thread in this conflict is that there is a silent battle raging
over influence and power between Ahmadinejad – who as the president of Iran
represents the country’s civil institutions – and the religious institution
that is led by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, whose position is unelected
and who is considered the highest and indeed final authority in Iran.
difference is that this conflict took place following the 2009 presidential
elections, whose results were called into question by the Iranian opposition.
This resulted in widespread protests across the country which was strongly
suppressed by the Iranian authorities, whilst protest leaders Mir Hossein
Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi were placed under house arrest. Supreme Leader Ali
Khamenei intervened and took Ahmadinejad’s side, confirming that Ahmadinejad
had legitimately won the presidential elections. Ahmadinejad emerged from these
elections weakened, as he had only remained in power because the Iranian
Supreme Leader stood by him, whereas in the previous presidential elections it
was his own popularity that guaranteed his election.
knows where this clear conflict – which is ongoing – will lead. There is talk
that Ahmadinejad is planning for his son-in-law [Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei] to
stand at the forthcoming presidential elections. This is a conflict that
reflects a development that was certain to happen, three decades after the
Iranian revolution that resulted in religious scholars dominating rule in Iran.
Any person holding the presidency in Iran wants to rule in reality, rather than
being a subordinate to the Iranian Supreme Leader who has not left Iran since
1989. Will Ahmadinejad be the president that turns on the pillars of the regime
and renews the system of governance to confirm his own authority, as Sadat did
in Egypt with the so-called [Nasserite] “centres of power” in the early
seventies? This is an open question that requires thinking about, even if this
results in one jumping to the wrong conclusion.
-This commentary was published in Asharq al-Awsat on 21/09/2011
-Ali Ibrahim is Asharq Al-Awsat's Deputy Editor-in-Chief, based in London