The rebels may have retreated, but the revolution goes on.
BY MICHAEL WEISS
The
siege of Homs is over. After a confused and ominous 24-hour news cycle, the
Syrian rebels have made a "tactical withdrawal" from the restive
neighborhood of Baba Amr, which withstood a month of rocket fire, drone-guided
artillery shelling, and possibly even helicopter gunship attacks by President
Bashar al-Assad's security forces.
But
the rebels' withdrawal was not a total defeat. As of March 1, the Free Syrian
Army (FSA) could still boast that it had kept some 7,000 soldiers from Maher
al-Assad's elite 4th Division at bay on Baba Amr's outskirts, a claim that
appeared corroborated by eyewitness accounts. One Homsi in an adjoining
district told me last night, Feb. 29, via Skype that tanks were moving in and
out of his street in a violent attempt to enter Baba Amr. They'd failed.
Although
Baba Amr's fall was inevitable, the snow and freezing cold cast an image of a
Levantine Stalingrad in the making. Electricity and water have been shut off in
large parts of Homs -- a city of 1 million people -- for the past three days.
Food is scarce, prompting the United Nations to fret about mass starvation.
What
happens to the civilians in Baba Amr now, particularly with communication lines
cut and no YouTube clips being uploaded, is up to the Assad regime's
totalitarian imagination. The regime has apparently given the International
Committee of the Red Cross the green light to send in humanitarian aid and
evacuate the wounded on March 2. Clearly, this step is designed to lend the
impression that the armed rebels were responsible for Baba Amr's misfortunes
all along. Sources inside the neighborhood, however, say that a
"bloodbath" is currently taking place. Seventeen civilians have been
beheaded or partially beheaded by security forces, the activist organization
Avaaz said March 1.
With
the destruction of the opposition's stronghold in Homs, Syria's revolutionaries
aren't going to melt into thin air. U.S. and European policymakers might like
to believe that Homsis wake up each morning and consult the writings of Gene
Sharp, but the bulk of the opposition now recognizes that the revolution must
be accomplished through arms and that returning to the passive resistance of
eight months ago would amount to a suicide pact.
After
all, it's Assad -- not the revolutionaries -- who transformed this into an
armed conflict in the first place. The original peaceful protest movement,
which originally called for "reforms," was met with wanton acts of
brutality. Nor have most Syrians forgotten that 13-year-old Hamza al-Khatib, an
early rallying symbol for the revolution, wasn't carrying a Kalashnikov when
Assad's security forces kidnapped him and then delivered his mutilated corpse
back to his parents.
Would
these security forces and their shabiha mercenaries promise not to arrest,
torture, or shoot at more men, women, and children if the opposition disarmed?
If so, who'd believe them? Tens of thousands of civilian fighters and military
defectors are fanned out all over Syria at present -- will they be granted
"amnesty" to trade their guns in for slogans calling for the toppling
of the regime?
Changes
are also afoot in the makeup of the Syrian National Council (SNC), the
political body designed to represent the opposition, to adapt to the new
reality on the ground. On March 1, the SNC established a "military
bureau," consisting of civilians and soldiers, to unify the armed opposition
and coordinate weapons delivery. The council's media spokesman, Ausama Monajed,
responded to an email inquiry asking who would sit on the new military bureau
by stating that FSA leader Riad al-Asaad, retired Brig. Gen. Akil Hashem, and
Gen. Mustafa al-Sheikh, and others "have [all] been contacted and [are] on
board."
Reports,
however, already suggest that Asaad wasn't even consulted about the new bureau,
and Hashem has declined to head the organization due to an acrimonious argument
with SNC President Burhan Ghalioun. And more bad news: Turkey has refused to
host the new bureau.
Whatever
the case, the military apparatus of the opposition has never trusted the
aspiring political leaders of the Syrian opposition. Asaad called the SNC
"traitors" a few weeks ago for not supporting the FSA and for
"conspiring" with the Arab League. Meanwhile, Sheikh recently tried
to set up a rival "Higher Revolutionary Council" to steal Asaad's
thunder.
No
matter who heads the SNC's military bureau, it's unclear whether it can actually
unify Syria's largely autonomous and atomized militias, which are increasingly
manned by civilians. Ghalioun was characteristically oblique in his Paris news
conference about the SNC's military strategy, saying that the new bureau's job
would be "to protect those peaceful protesters and civilians."
This
implies exclusively defensive operations rather than offensive ones, which many
rebels unaffiliated with the FSA -- indeed, openly hostile to it -- have
already carried out in Damascus's suburbs and the northern province of Idlib.
Like
many decisions devised through the SNC's manic-depressive policymaking process,
the military bureau announcement was in response to the changing attitude of
the Syrian "street." And it's not the only change that followed the
international "Friends of Syria" conference in Tunisia last Friday,
Feb. 24. For starters, the conference led to semi-recognition of the Syrian
opposition by the United States and the European Union, which dubbed the SNC
"a legitimate representative" of the Syrian people -- but not the
sole representative.
The
conference also led to Ghalioun's explicit offer to Syria's Kurds of a
"decentralized" government in a post-Assad state. This is crucial.
Kurds constitute as much as 15 percent of the Syrian population, and they want
the sort of autonomy their brethren enjoy in Iraq. Ghalioun's overture was
designed to forge a rapprochement with the Kurdish National Council (KNC), a
separate umbrella group made up of 11 Syrian Kurdish parties, which had suspended
its membership in the SNC and largely takes direction from Iraqi Kurdistan
President Masoud Barzani. Two KNC members told me at a conference in Copenhagen
last week that "we can put a million Kurds on the street" the minute
their demands are satisfied. This likely isn't an idle boast.
The
Friends of Syria conference also led to the formation of an angry breakaway
movement within the SNC, called the Syrian Patriotic Group, which is headed by
longtime dissidents Haitham al-Maleh and Fawaz Tello. Tello told me the other
day that this faction wants to better coordinate with the activists on the
ground to bring their prescriptions for winning the revolution in line with the
SNC's foreign advocacy work. This faction wants the SNC's 310-member General
Assembly expanded to "500 or 600" seats to make room for more
grassroots activists inside Syria.
"What
we are pushing for is to make the base of the opposition broader and to make
the SNC more democratic," Tello said, adding that the SNC's main
decision-making bodies, the Secretariat General and Presidential Council,
should be subject to elections rather than appointments and reappointments made
by Muslim Brotherhood fiat.
All
this is progress, of a sort, though how it manifests within Syria remains to be
seen. Senior U.S. officials pontificating on Capitol Hill would do well to
remember that activists and rebels have never waited for a by-your-leave from
the U.S. State Department -- much less from external opposition groups -- to
decide how to defend themselves and their families.
As
Homs submits to what some are calling an "occupation" by regime forces,
the next flashpoint could be Idlib, whole swaths of which are rebel-controlled
and which benefits from easy resupply from Turkey. Well, what happens when the
4th Division tries to storm this province? Unlike one neighborhood in Homs, the
vast province isn't so easily surrounded. Nevertheless, the last time a major
assault was waged in Idlib, 10,000 Syrians fled to Turkey, where they now
remain, living in tents. The Turks likely won't sit back and accept tens of
thousands of more -- they may be forced to make good on their much-promised
"buffer zone" out of necessity if not desire.
As
ever, the one setting the schedule for this revolution is none other than
Bashar al-Assad. The siege of Homs may be over, but the war for Syria has just
begun.
-This commentary was published in Foreign Policy on 01/03/2012
-Michael Weiss is communications director for the Henry Jackson Society, a foreign-policy think tank based in London. He blogs regularly about Syria and the Middle East for the Daily Telegraph
-Michael Weiss is communications director for the Henry Jackson Society, a foreign-policy think tank based in London. He blogs regularly about Syria and the Middle East for the Daily Telegraph
No comments:
Post a Comment