By David Kenner
Lebanese
Prime Minister Najib Mikati answered questions on Twitter on Sunday afternoon,
one day after Russia and China vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution on
Syria - a step that seems virtually guaranteed to plunge Lebanon's eastern
neighbor into further violence. So what did the premier want to talk about?
Spoiled spuds.
"I
realize that some of you are being kept busy with a story on expired potato
chips which clearly changes the usual focus of the discussion," Mikati
wrote. "Let me reassure you that instructions have been given to
investigate expired potato chips story, perform related Lab tests & take
measures."
Mikati
was referring to a dastardly plot to alter the expiration date of 35 tons of
potato chips at a warehouse owned by his brother-in-law. Whatever the facts of
the case, it is something less than the great struggles against dictatorship
seizing the rest of the Middle East. It also says volumes about the issue
Mikati doesn't want to talk about: The slow-motion collapse of President Bashar
al-Assad's regime.
Mikati's
line is that Lebanon will "disassociate" itself from events in Syria,
remaining neutral in order to avoid the blowback from the incipient civil war.
But all the major political actors in Beirut are doing precisely the opposite
-- even those within Mikati's own government. Lebanese Ambassador to the U.N.
Nawaf Salam, for example, was talking with U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan
Rice on the floor of the Security Council just before the key vote on Syria.
Salam reports to Lebanon's Foreign Ministry, which is run by a representative
of the Amal party, a close ally of Hezbollah. It's difficult to see how
inserting himself into the proceedings serves the purpose of "disassociating"
Lebanon from events to the east.
The
examples are piling up. As Hezbollah stages raids on towns in search of Syrian
dissidents, arms smugglers carry weapons across the border to Syrian
militiamen. Hassan Nasrallah promises to stand by Assad to the end, and Sunni
leader Saad Hariri says that "change is imminent" in Damascus.
Violence
is also piling up. Eight Lebanese have reportedly been killed in Syrian
incursions across the border since the uprising began, and the Lebanese Army is
now using helicopters in the north to search for "terrorist groups"
at the request of the Syrian regime. And twice in the past three months,
Lebanese parliamentarians have gotten into fistfights on live television.
There
is little point in criticizing Lebanon's prime minister, who is picking from a
series of bad options, of being disingenuous. But from the rise of Gamal Abdel
Nasser to the civil war, Lebanon has a sad history of being destabilized by
regional forces beyond its control. If Syria is poised to become 1980s Lebanon
on steroids, as my colleague Marc Lynch writes, Beirut will get pulled down
into the tragedy sooner or later.
This commentary was published in Foreign Policy on 06/02/2012
No comments:
Post a Comment