By Derek Bolton
The
release of November’s IAEA report sighting “credible” evidence of Iranian
efforts to develop nuclear weapons has largely played into the hands of the
Israeli Ministry of Defense. As Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak has sought
to muster support for unilateral military strikes against Iran, many have
surmised that Israeli military intervention may be imminent.
However,
this fails to account for the fact that Israel, through its intelligence wing
the Mossad, has already been engaged in a covert war against Iran’s nuclear
program for almost a decade. The only change in recent months is that this
ongoing campaign has slowly become more overt.
Dagan’s Legacy
The
Mossad’s intensified pressure on Iran can be traced back to the rise of Meir
Dagan as head of the organization. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon brought
in Dagan in 2001 to revamp and reinvigorate the faltering intelligence
organization after serious setbacks in the 1980s and 1990s. Dagan had already
demonstrated his prowess and ruthlessness as the leader of a covert Israeli
task force aimed at disrupting and combating terrorist financing in the
Palestinian territories. Consequently, Sharon sought to utilize Dagan to forge
a “Mossad with a knife between its teeth.”
Dagan
revamped the Mossad’s focus almost immediately. “The list must be short,” he
said. “If we continue pretending we can do everything, in the end we won’t do
anything.” Since then, the Mossad has restricted itself to focusing almost
exclusively on Iran. As Dagan himself promised, “Let me deal with Iran my way.
I promise to give you deterrents in time.”
Despite
the skepticism Dagan has expressed since leaving office about the wisdom of an
overt military strike on Iran, the decade since his appointment has seen a
marked increase in what appear to be covert Mossad operations targeting Iran’s
nuclear program. Author and journalist Ronan Bergam has numbered “the
disappearance of an Iranian nuclear scientist, the crash of two planes carrying
cargo related to the project, and two labs that burst into flames” among the
numerous, mysterious misfortunes to befall the Iranian nuclear program in
recent years. And in 2005, Iran created the Oghabz, a nuclear counter-espionage
agency, granting tacit recognition to the role of Mossad’s espionage campaign
in the mishaps.
Sabotage and Assassination
The
Mossad appears to have undertaken two distinct routes to counter Iran:
industrial sabotage and targeted assassinations. To accomplish the former, the
Mossad has established a series of dummy companies to sell flawed components or
faulty technical documents sought by Iran. For example, in April 2006, Iran’s
Natanz facility suffered an explosion caused by faulty electrical devices
purchased from such a company in Europe, causing the destruction of 50
centrifuges.
More
famously, the Mossad has also tried its hand at cyberwarfare. In a public press
release on November 29, 2010, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for the
first time admitted that Iran’s nuclear program had been temporarily disrupted
by a computer worm known as Stuxnet, resulting in the malfunction of several
centrifuges. Although Ahmadinejad had previously noted setbacks within the
nuclear program, this was the first instance in which he publicly attributed
such delays to acts of sabotage.
Alongside
industrial facilities, Iranian nuclear scientists have become a main focus of
Mossad agents conducting intimidation and assassination programs. According to
intelligence analyst Reva Bhalla, there is “strong intelligence” that the
Mossad assassinated leading Iranian nuclear physicist Ardeshir Hassanpour in
January 2007. Hassanpour, who had been a vital member of the country’s uranium
enrichment team, reportedly suffocated from gas fumes emitted from a broken
fireplace. Although the death was officially claimed to be an accident, within
the intelligence community it has become widely accepted that the Mossad was
behind it.
However,
the largest setback to the Iranian nuclear program occurred in late 2010 with
the attempted assassination of two of the program’s leading scientists. On
November 29, 2010, unidentified assailants simultaneously carried out two
separate bomb attacks using remote-controlled magnetic devices attached to the
targets’ cars. Majid Shahriari, who had managed a “major project” within the
nuclear program, was killed as a result, while Fereydoon Abbasi, who has been
deemed even more vital to the program, was severely wounded. Both men were seen
as vital contributors to the nuclear program, with one U.S. official
commenting, “They’re both bad people, and the work they do is exactly what you
need to design a bomb. They’re both top scientists.”
Where Credit Is Due
The
2010 bombings are only some of the most recent incidents in a string of attacks
that have claimed the lives of at least five Iranian scientists, including
Massoud Ali-Mohammadi, who was killed in January of 2010.
Ahmadinejad
and the Iranian press have openly condemned the Mossad and agents of the West
for the assassinations. “The enemies of the Iranian nation,” Ahmadinejad said,
“who have lost hope in their pressure and sanctions projects, have once again,
on the eve of negotiations with Iran, resorted to blind terrorist attacks so
that they can advance their illegitimate and oppressive demands against the
Iranian nation.”
Although
the Mossad has not openly claimed responsibility for the attacks, the
organization’s silence on the issue seems to indicate a tacit admission of its
role in the bombings. It would not be unreasonable to make similar assumptions
about the recent explosion at a missile base near Tehran, which claimed the
lives of 17 individuals – including the alleged “architect” of Iran’s missile
program, Major General Hassan Moghaddam.
Israel’s
most recent wave of hostile overtures toward Iran should thus be seen as a
natural extension of the policies it has been carrying out for years. As a hawkish choir rises in Tel Aviv and
analysts scramble to predict what will happen, the question is not whether
Israel will attack Iran – it already has.
-This commentary was published in Foreign Policy In Focus on
22/11/2011
- Derek Bolton is a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus
- Derek Bolton is a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus
No comments:
Post a Comment