By Robert Fisk
The Al-Aqsa mosque forms the backdrop to a Palestinian flag
So
there I was, on the Via Dolorosa of course, chatting to a middle-aged guy in a
red T-shirt and just a wisp of a beard with a prayer rug under his left arm.
And
I asked him, of course, what he thought about Barack Obama's speech. He grinned
at me like he knew I had already guessed what he was going to say. "What
did you expect?" he asked. Correct guess. After all, Haaretz had already
referred this week to "President Barack Netanyahu" while the racist
Israeli foreign minister said he would sign the speech with both hands. Maybe,
I reflected in Jerusalem yesterday, Obama really is seeking election – to the
Israeli Knesset.
But
what was so striking about the streets of Jerusalem yesterday was the sense of
resignation, of weary acceptance. The Israeli papers had warned of mass
violence, but the crowds who turned up for morning prayers at Al-Aqsa simply
laid out their prayer rugs on the highway outside the Damascus Gate or in the
laneways behind the mosque and showed scarcely any interest in talking about
Obama. Maybe America's UN veto will rouse them to passion, but I have my
doubts.
It's
a bit like the aftermath of the Abu Ghraib torture pictures, when the Americans
restricted the number of photos to be released because they feared the pictures
would enrage Iraqis. But I was in Baghdad that day and no one expressed any
particular rage. What did I expect? After all, the Iraqis knew all about Abu
Ghraib already – they were the ones who had been tortured there. So, too,
Jerusalem yesterday. The Palestinians have watched America's uncritical
acceptance of Israeli occupation – the longest in the world – for 44 years.
They knew all about it. It is only we Westerners who are horrified by torture
pictures and by Obama's hypocrisy.
The
Palestinians even accepted the Israeli rule on morning prayers. No one under
the age of 50 would be allowed to worship on the Al-Aqsa esplanade. Which is
why those who could not enter simply spread their rugs on the tarmac and
flagstones outside – in effect enlarging the forbidden holy esplanade over the
traffic islands and pavements. Even the Israeli border guards and cops treated
the thing as routine. There was, shall we say, a normality about it, a bit of
shouting from a young man at the barricade on the main highway, a lot of
shrugging by the Israelis. There were even some nicely groomed police horses
which watched the proceedings with big, tired eyes.
On
the iron barrier, the police captain didn't even bother to ask for my press
pass; he just flicked his head and pulled the barrier aside. The television
crews dutifully filmed the Israelis holding their assault rifles and
truncheons. And – since I am a believer in the Department of Home Truths – I
have to add that in other Middle East nations right now, I doubt if armed
policemen would be quite so indifferent to the cameras. Needless to say, the
more aggressive of Israel's colonisers in the West Bank are not so keen to be
filmed. Hence the scarves over their faces when they attack Palestinians. And
daubing "Mohamed is a pig" in Hebrew on the wall of the mosque at
Qusra, 30 miles from Nablus, wasn't going to improve Arab-Israeli relations.
The Palestinians have painted out "is a pig", but naturally left the
name of the Prophet untouched. You can see the same stuff on the walls of the
Jewish colony at Hebron.
But
again, it's acquired its own normality, like the massive Israeli wall that
scrapes across the landscape above Jerusalem, a terrible, hateful scar on the
politics of this place which should blight the eye of every Palestinian or
Israeli who sees it. Oddly, we Westerners seem to have stopped talking about
it; maybe that's why we like calling it a "security barrier" rather
than a wall, something that is a problem to be solved – to quote Obama –
"by the parties themselves." And there was one little incident
yesterday which illustrated this rather well.
Prayers
had ended at the Al-Aqsa mosque and the police were ready to go home and the
shopkeepers were reopening their stalls when an old Palestinian woman in black
came hobbling down some steps with two large, empty cardboard boxes. They were
the "legs" to a table upon which she started arranging a set of
tawdry children's clothes and plastic shoes decorated with stars.
But
a soldier told her to move the boxes three feet further down the street. There
was no reason to – he was bored, I suppose, and in the mood for a bit of fun –
but the old lady started shouting in Arabic that "It's all over". I think
she meant that it was "all over" for the Palestinians – or maybe for
the Israelis. But the soldier laughed and repeated her words in Arabic.
"Yes, it's all over," he said, and maybe he was talking about the
morning prayers.
And
as he went on taunting the old woman and kicking the cardboard boxes, a trail
of tourists came winding their way up the laneway from the Via Dolorosa. The
woman was shrieking away and the tourists, light-coloured hair, blue eyes,
speaking German, were all too aware of what was happening.
Their
eyes flicked to the side of the road where the woman was shouting and the
soldier was still kicking the boxes, but their heads didn't move. They still
faced forward, as if the whole wretched scene was a normal part of Jerusalem
life. They wouldn't directly look at the woman or the soldier. They certainly
wouldn't intervene. And so they passed by on the other side.
This commentary was published in The Independent on 24/09/2011
No comments:
Post a Comment