There seems to be a pattern in which women's rights are granted in
principle in Saudi Arabia but never in practice
By Nesrine Malik
King
Abdullah's declaration that women will be allowed to vote and run as candidates
in the next round of local elections in Saudi Arabia, in 2015, is being hailed
as significant news. However, followers of Saudi politics will recall that
similar assurances have been voiced before and not acted upon.
There
have been strong objections to the ban and several Saudi intellectuals have
called for a boycott of this month's polls in protest.
In
the last elections, in 2005, practical considerations and the difficulty of
preparing for women to take part at short notice were the official reasons
given for the postponement of the decision. Elections scheduled for 2009 did
not go ahead.
Officials
have had six years to get ready but when the advisory Shura council recommended
to the king this month that the ban be lifted it was too late to do so this
year. It would seem that separate polling stations for men and women remained a
problem.
This
is something often seen in the Kingdom with regards to women's rights: a
promise and an expression of goodwill scuppered due to bureaucracy. There is no
law prohibiting women from driving, for example, but an administrative vacuum
makes it impossible to get a driving licence or register to drive. "We are
not ready" is the refrain often heard from those in authority.
This
is the first time the king has made an overt promise regarding women's
participation in politics, and it is encouraging that the issue is being
discussed. But there remains a concern that the pattern will continue, in which
women's rights appear to have been granted in principle but never in practice.
-This commentary was published in The Guardian on 25/09/2011
- Nesrine Malik is a Sudanese-born writer and commentator who lives in London
- Nesrine Malik is a Sudanese-born writer and commentator who lives in London
No comments:
Post a Comment