By Rami G. Khouri
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas
The
Palestinian request last Friday for United Nations recognition of a Palestinian
state in the land occupied by Israel in 1967 created quite a diplomatic stir
after weeks of anticipation and guessing whether the Palestinian leadership
would ask the Security Council for full UN membership, or take the more sure
route of asking the General Assembly for non-member observer state status.
Now
that the request for full membership has been made, Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas have made
their speeches, and the diplomatic dust has largely settled, we can conclude
several things.
I
would list these as: a dramatic change of strategy by the Palestinians but with
uncertain results; a continuing pro-Israel tilt by the United States; a
consistent but increasingly isolated and unconvincing strategy by the Israelis;
an embarrassing show of incompetence and daydreaming by the Quartet (the United
States, UN, Russia and European Union) that is supposed to shepherd the two
sides to conclude a permanent negotiated agreement.
In
the end, all we can judge are the words of the various parties, because the
past week has been a festival of rhetoric above all else. Nobody has made any
substantive moves on the ground, with even the Palestinian request for UN
recognition being words on paper that signal intent rather than any tangible
accomplishment.
The
intent that Abbas has signalled, though, is potentially a game-changer if he
sticks to his position and refuses to resume the diplomatic game according to
the old rules that have failed to achieve any progress since the Madrid peace
talks nearly 20 years ago.
If
Abbas persists in refusing to resume negotiations while the Israelis continue
their settlement building, this would turn out to be the dramatic change that
could have far-reaching consequences - but only if several things were to
happen in the coming months and years.
Withdrawing
from the negotiations is not particularly impressive if there is no alternative
strategy that could realistically bring the Palestinians their national rights
through some other means than American-mediated direct talks with Israel. It
remains unclear what that alternative strategy might be, beyond asking the UN
General Assembly to reaffirm the Palestinians’ right to sovereign statehood.
A
UN vote recognising the state of Palestine is not a strategy; it is a
procedural move that signals the fact that the Palestinians will not persist in
the failed old diplomatic approach that brought them no real gains on the road
to sovereignty. To be effective, this move must be followed up by a complete
Fateh-Hamas reconciliation, rebuilding the institutions of the Palestine
Liberation Organisation, reformulating the Palestinian national consensus on
engaging and/or resisting Israel, and defining mechanisms by which all
Palestinians around the region and the world can share in decision making and
lend their ideas, support and weight to their leadership’s diplomatic moves.
The
chances of this happening with the current leaders are slim, but the popular
will for them to happen is huge.
If
Abbas’ firm stand on rejecting negotiations under the failed old
American-Israeli-dominated formula is the most significant development of the
last few weeks, and the American tilt to Israel and Netanyahu’s speech are mere
continuations of the stalemated and violent status quo, the most pitiful
development has to be the statement issued by the Quartet during the weekend.
It proposed that both sides reengage in a serious diplomatic effort that leads
to concrete proposals within a few months and a Palestinian state within a
year.
This
is a comical and totally inept performance that is no surprise, because the
Quartet has proved to be a malicious mechanism by which the United States seeks
to maintain a pro-Israeli tilt in the overall diplomacy surrounding
Arab-Israeli negotiations.
By
merely repeating the failed formula of the past, the Quartet members show that
they have totally missed the point of how the Palestinians are demanding that
the diplomatic rules be rewritten, not revived.
This
is not surprising, given the prominent role in the Quartet played by Dennis
Ross of the United States and Tony Blair, the group’s special envoy to the
Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Men like these - and the governments they
represent - have proved many times over that they lack the honesty and trust
that are needed to succeed in diplomacy. It is no surprise that at the moment
of truth, they reaffirm their inability to recognise the truth and come to
terms with it.
The
key dynamic to watch now is within the Palestinian camp, where reconciliation,
unity and national consensus will be vital for any progress beyond the drama
last week in New York, where old rules were discarded, but new ones have yet to
be formulated.
The
historic change last week was that Palestinians stopped acting like helpless
victims of history and global politics, and started acting like a
self-interested party that has not only rights to demand, but also political
agency and the capacity to act.
This commentary was published in The Jordan Times on 30/09/2011
No comments:
Post a Comment