Promises and words are tools, but in Netanyahu's case, the
masquerade is over, even for those who are addicted to false hopes; the man is
dangerous.
By Sefi Rachlevsky
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
The
government's totally irresponsible decision to reject the convenient compromise
with Turkey that was proposed by the United States did bring one benefit. A
dilemma has been resolved. To the question of whether Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu is an extremist leader to an unfathomable degree, or whether he is simply
an opportunist, a waffler - a liar, we now have an answer: Netanyahu is no
liar.
Of
Caesar, one of the protagonists of Yaakov Shabtai's novel, "Past
Continuous" ("Zikhron Devarim" ), it was written that lies would
simply trip off his tongue. But Caesar was not a pathological liar; his lies
were simply dictated by his stubborn insistance on being with three women at
the same time. Deception wasn't part of his character, it was a tool to
maintain an extreme situation.
That's
the way it is for an extremist leader, too. Nobody views the extremists who
brought disaster on the first half of the 20th century as opportunistic
con-men. Fraud and false impressions were the tools they needed. The extremist
leader must use fraud to resolve the dissonance between his extremism and his
leadership position, which requires a centrist image.
This
is the adulterer's method: "I have a weakness for women," "She
opened a button," "I love you"; while to the others, he'll say,
"I'm going to leave her," "When the boy is born. Grows up. Gets
drafted."
Promises,
deceit and words are tools. But in Netanyahu's case, the masquerade is over,
even for those who are addicted to false hopes.
Among
the octet leading us to disaster there was only one who opposed the American
compromise. The defense, diplomatic and legal establishments supported it. The
warning that if Turkey fell, our embassies in Egypt and Jordan would not
survive, echoed loudly in the background. Ehud Barak, Dan Meridor and even Eli
Yishai and Benny Begin supported the compromise. Avigdor Lieberman made it
clear he could swallow the wording. Only Netanyahu remained ensconced in his
extremism.
Like
the other octet's farces - a deal for Gilad Shalit is imminent, the extension
of the settlement freeze is imminent, along with 20 stealth aircraft - the
compromises aren't evasive. It's not Lieberman, it's not "that
woman," whom he has fashioned into a false demon, it's not fear of the son
who opened a Kahanist Facebook page, and it's not the father who has the same
opinions; it's Netanyahu's own holy spirit.
Before
the last elections, a warning appeared on these pages. It pretended to make
known a shocking truth about one of the party leaders. But a real cautionary
note must be issued regarding Netanyahu: The man is dangerous.
Yossi
Ben-Aharon, the director-general of the Prime Minister's Office under Yitzhak
Shamir, said that to his right there was only a wall. But Netanyahu is beyond
that wall. He's in the place where the "with blood and fire we'll boot out
Rabin" demonstrations were organized.
People
like Yehuda Bauer, and Yoram Kaniuk and myself who attended a meeting last week
with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas experienced the disaster.
Before us, they said, was a competent leader who had brought security and
prosperity to the West Bank, someone who, in Israeli political terms, is
positioned between Meretz and Hadash. In his moderation, he could be a member
of Brit Shalom, a partner to the Jewish world that was destroyed in Europe. The
epidemic of destructive propaganda turning Abbas into an "extremist"
is of our own making.
Just
over a week ago, half a million people protested - 10 percent of the population
of protesting age. That's equivalent to five million Britons or 25 million
Americans, a number that in any democracy would lead to elections and a total
change.
But
here, under the most extreme Israeli leadership, the boots come to sweep away
the tents as if they were dust, the finance minister gives them the finger, and
Netanyahu rolls with laughter when Rabbi Ovadia Yosef tells him that the
million, "have no chance against you."
So
in order for there to be a chance, every citizen must rise up - not with ugly
text messages that tried to prevent the appointment of a chief of staff who
would go along with the extremism, but openly. It's not for nothing that a
right-winger like former Mossad chief Meir Dagan warned of a looming disaster.
This
is the responsibility of Barak, Meridor and Barack Obama. It's also the
responsibility of Labor voters to choose a leader who will draw voters from the
right and from among those who don't vote, and who will shout down the person
who is leading a generations-old dream to an apocalypse.
This commentary was published in HAARETZ on 12/09/2011
No comments:
Post a Comment